Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Owning your wind farm: Trickier than it seems

Saturday, May 24th, 2008

The title is a little odd as I wouldn’t expect it to be a trivial process to own a wind farm.  I must not be optimistic enough?

wind

Nevertheless, the Twin Cities Daily Planet investigates all the hurdles and red tape one must go through in order to own a wind farm these days.  They find it’s not as easy for John Doe as it is for big utilities.  Most Americans don’t qualify for the wind farm tax credits that large utilities do.

The ideas the author promotes sound a lot like the Distributism (or distributionism) economic philosophy formulated by G. K. Chesterton.

According to distributism, the ownership of the means of production should be spread as widely as possible among the general populace, rather than being centralized under the control of a few state bureaucrats (some forms of socialism) or wealthy private individuals (capitalism). A summary of distributism is found in Chesterton’s statement: “Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists.”

St. Paul Saints baseball fans upset about bobblefoot giveaway

Saturday, May 24th, 2008

saints

Some fans threatened to never attend another Saints baseball game over the tasteless souvenir that will be given away at the game. They are giving away “bobblefoot” stalls to commemorate both National Tap Dance Day and the Senator Larry Craig incident at the MSP airport last year. WCCO gets reactions from fans.

I can certainly understand why parents would be upset – how do they explain this to their kids?  It’s not very family-friendly entertainment.

ST. PAUL, MN (May 21, 2008) – Some of the most famous dance halls in the country include Radio City Music Hall in New York, the Fox Theater in Detroit and now the list includes a restroom at the Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport. With so much fanfare around dancing, the St. Paul Saints will honor “tappers” during National Tap Dance Day.

During the Sunday, May 25 game the first 2,500 fans in attendance will receive a bobblefoot. The design is a bathroom stall, with a foot that peaks out of the bottom and “taps” up and down. The day coincides with National Tap Dance Day.

While many people tap their foot because they are impatient, others may do it because they are nervous. It doesn’t matter if your tapping style is done with a “wide stance” or is used as some sort of code, the Saints are asking all fans to tap to their heart’s content on May 25.

The stalls are already popping up on eBay:

bobblefoot

Iraq War cost more than WWI or Vietnam

Saturday, May 24th, 2008

Wondering why both Bush’s and Congress’s approval ratings continue to plunge?

Hint: The Trillion-Dollar War

Update: making life difficult for McCain.

Reason X-Rays the Iraq war spending.

The War on Terror is now more expensive than Vietnam or World War I—but the dishonest way Washington is paying for it may prove costliest of all.

How much money is $1 trillion? Enough to pay for the entire 1976 federal budget, adjusted for inflation. Enough to write a check for $37,500 to every Iraqi man, woman, and child. Enough to buy 169,492 Black Hawk helicopters, or 455 stealth bombers. Enough, in nominal terms, to pay for the entire federal government from 1789 to 1957. And it’s 10 times more than what specialists predict it would take to eradicate malaria once and for all.

To distract people from the real price tag of a two-front war, the president and Congress have used an unprecedented and fiscally irresponsible budgetary trick: a series of “emergency” supplemental spending bills totaling hundreds of billions of dollars. This scheme has allowed them not only to hide the costs of the conflicts but also to avoid painful budget choices while funneling billions of dollars in unvetted goodies to favored interest groups.

bush

poll

cost

FBI infiltrating RNC protest groups

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008

In preparation for the Republican National Convention, the FBI is soliciting informants to keep tabs on local protest groups

moles

Need some extra cash this fall?  The FBI is looking for a good informant…

—someone to show up at “vegan potlucks” throughout the Twin Cities and rub shoulders with RNC protestors, schmoozing his way into their inner circles, then reporting back to the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, a partnership

“This is all part of a larger government effort to quell political dissent,” says Jordan Kushner, an attorney who represented Ganley and other Critical Mass arrestees. “The Joint Terrorism Task Force is another example of using the buzzword ‘terrorism’ as a basis to clamp down on people’s freedoms and push forward a more authoritarian government.”

Local CBS Meteorologist: Global Warming ‘extremism’ uses ‘squishy science’

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008

Local Minneapolis-WCCO (CBS) meteorologist, Mike Fairbourne, says that the environmental movement is practicing “squishy science” when it ties human activity to global warming. Comments from WCCO.

Fairbourne is one of 31,000 scientists (9,021 PhDs) who agree that the human impact on global warming is overblown. Here’s the petition.

petition

“Do we need to be wise stewards [of the Earth]? Absolutely,” Fairbourne said. “Do we have to pin everything that happens on global warming? No, we need to have cooler heads.”

Asked why there has been so much momentum toward connecting human activity and global warming, Fairbourne said, “They’re doing it for a lot of reasons; some may be scientific, but most of them are political. We need to be calm and look at scientific evidence and evaluate it.”

Fairbourne, a University of Utah graduate, said he has talked “to a number of meteorologists who have similar opinions” as his, adding that he is concerned about “the extremism that is attached to the global warming.”

According to the Daily Glean, zero local MSP meteorologists publicly adhere to the theory that human activity is the cause of “global warming.” If the “evidence” supports global warming, why do so many scientists disagree?

Star Tribune readers respond:

worry poll link

squishy poll link

Frustrated NWA flight attendant starts fire mid-flight + other bizarre news

Friday, May 16th, 2008

Unbelievable!

A 19 year old twin cities resident and NWA flight attendant lit some paper towels on fire to set of the plane’s smoke alarm and bring the flight to an early end because he was frustrated with the MSP to Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada route.

nwa

KARE11.com reports:

The charge of setting fire aboard a civil aircraft carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison.

Pilot Steve Peterka told authorities that an indicator light came on about 35 minutes into the flight, showing smoke in the rear bathroom.

Peterka called Rojas, who was assigned passengers in the back of the plane, and asked him to check the bathroom, documents said. Rojas, another flight attendant and a passenger were credited with quickly putting out the flames with fire extinguishers, authorities said.

Investigators later found a lighter in one of the overhead bins. Rojas confessed after authorities interviewed him, the complaint said.


In other unbelievably bizarre news – another local 19 year old survived jumping head-first into a wood chipper.


And some less odd news – a MN Judge tries to close a loophole in a recent smoking ban. Since smoking is allowed only as part of a theatrical performance, bars held “theater nights” where patrons paid a small fee to become an “actor” in the evening performance (i.e. smoking).

Following the ruling, Bullseye owner Robert Ripley said he is asking his bartenders to prevent smoking indoors and remove all ashtrays.

But he also seized on a footnote in the ruling speculating that some performances may fit within the statewide ban and that they may be considered on a case-by-case basis.

“I think we’re going to start writing our own scripts,” Ripley said.

February, customers in bars from the Iron Range to the metro area — with the bars’ encouragement — started dressing in Renaissance costumes or calling themselves Garth Brooks and lighting up.

Many bars said it was an often-successful attempt to win back patrons after seeing steep declines in revenue after the ban took effect last year. Notices about the smoking performances were posted on doors outside the establishments, and customers would typically buy a pin for $1 or $2 designating them as part of the show.

But Abrams didn’t buy arguments made in court last week that the performances are a form of protected free speech that fit within the law’s exception.

“The criterion for selection of the cast appears to be people with $2 and a desire to smoke in the bar. There is not the slightest suggestion that talent or an interest in conveying a message, other than smoking, is sought from any actor,” he wrote.


Twin Cities get State OK to extend bar closing time for RNC – for a fee!

Twin Cities bars can stay open extra late during the Republican National Convention, thanks to a state measure signed Thursday by Gov. Tim Pawlenty. The provision, part of an omnibus liquor bill, allows bars within the seven-county metro area to stay open until 4 a.m. from the evening of Aug. 31, through the early morning of Sept. 5. The border cities of Northfield and New Prague are included.

Cities can decide whether to allow the later bar closings and what areas or license and zoning classifications would be affected. And they will be able to charge bars a fee of up to $2,500.

Because 2AM just isn’t late enough for national Republican big wigs. Or maybe it’s an attempt to make the city more protester friendly?


And speaking of the GOP RNC this Sept. in St. Ron Paul, city leaders are partnering with Humana to provide 1000 free bicycles during the convention.

freewheelin

To use a Freewheelin cycle, participants would register with credit cards to ensure that they don’t make off with the bikes, which otherwise are expected to be free to use. They then can go online, too, to track how many miles they’ve logged and calories they’ve burned.

Humana also is making 1,000 bicycles available to Denver during the Democratic National Convention, in turn giving Denver and the Twin Cities the opportunity to join Washington at the forefront of communal two-wheel initiatives.


Stories via the Daily Glean.

Gas plans from DC

Thursday, May 15th, 2008

WSJ – Barack’s bad idea:

Mr. Obama is right to oppose the gas-tax gimmick, but his idea is even worse. Neither proposal addresses the problem of energy supply, especially the lack of domestic oil and gas thanks to decades of Congressional restrictions on U.S. production. Mr. Obama supports most of those “no drilling” rules, but that hasn’t stopped him from denouncing high gas prices on the campaign trail. He is running TV ads in North Carolina that show him walking through a gas station and declaring that he’ll slap a tax on the $40 billion in “excess profits” of Exxon Mobil.

obama

The idea is catching on. Last week Pennsylvania Congressman Paul Kanjorski introduced a windfall profits tax as part of what he called the “Consumer Reasonable Energy Price Protection Act of 2008.” So now we have Congress threatening to help itself to business profits even though Washington already takes 35% right off the top with the corporate income tax.

You may also be wondering how a higher tax on energy will lower gas prices. Normally, when you tax something, you get less of it, but Mr. Obama seems to think he can repeal the laws of economics. We tried this windfall profits scheme in 1980. It backfired. The Congressional Research Service found in a 1990 analysis that the tax reduced domestic oil production by 3% to 6% and increased oil imports from OPEC by 8% to 16%. Mr. Obama nonetheless pledges to lessen our dependence on foreign oil, which he says “costs America $800 million a day.” Someone should tell him that oil imports would soar if his tax plan becomes law. The biggest beneficiaries would be OPEC oil ministers.

Oil company profits aren’t excessive:

Exxon’s profits are soaring with the recent oil price spike, but the energy industry’s earnings aren’t as outsized as the politicians seem to think. Thomson Financial calculates that profits from the oil and natural gas industry over the past year were 8.3% of investment, while the all-industry average is 7.8%. And this was a boom year for oil. An analysis by the Cato Institute’s Jerry Taylor finds that between 1970 and 2003 (which includes peak and valley years for earnings) the oil and gas business was “less profitable than the rest of the U.S. economy.” These are hardly robber barons.

Late this week, a group of Senate Republicans led by Pete Domenici of New Mexico introduced the “American Energy Production Act of 2008″ to expand oil production off the U.S. coasts and in Alaska. It has the potential to increase domestic production enough to keep America running for five years with no foreign imports. With the world price of oil at $116 a barrel, if not now, when? No word yet if Senators Clinton and Obama will take time off from denouncing oil profits to vote for that.


US Senate Democrats unveil new energy tax plan:

…slap a 25 percent windfall profits tax on firms that don’t invest in new energy sources

The Democrats’ energy bill seeks to lay the blame for record-high gasoline prices over $3.60 a gallon on the Bush administration, big oil companies like Exxon and the OPEC oil cartel.

The American Petroleum Institute, which lobbies for big U.S. oil companies, said Democrats’ plans would discourage investment in energy production and lead to less supply.

“None of these proposals will lower the price at the pump,” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said. “All will increase the strain on the family budget.”

The Senate bill seeks to revive a plan already passed by both the Senate and the House of Representatives that would allow the federal government to sue OPEC — source of one-third of global oil supply — for price manipulatio.

Good luck with that…


Meanwhile, Ron Paul is brazen enough to suggest that the government itself is partly to blame for the high gas prices:

federal and state taxes can account for as much as a third of what consumers’ pay at the pump. The Federal Government’s boom-and-bust monetary policy also makes consumers vulnerable to inflation and to constant fluctuations in the prices of essential goods such as oil.

Basic economics says that when government restricts the supply of a good, the price will increase. Yet Congress continues to reject simple measures that could increase the supply of oil. For example, Congress refuses to allow reasonable, environmentally sensitive, offshore drilling. Congress also refuses to remove the numerous regulatory hurdles that add to the prohibitively expensive task of constructing new refineries. Building a new refinery requires billions of dollars in capital investment. It can take several years just to obtain the necessary federal permits. Even after the permits are obtained, construction of a refinery may still be delayed or even halted by frivolous lawsuits. It is no wonder that there has not been a new refinery constructed in the United States since 1976.

Feel-good legislation: Congress’ symbolic energy bill

Thursday, May 15th, 2008

Yesterday congress voted to do something that they openly admitted will make no difference – stop filling the strategic petroleum reserve. How stupid do they think we are? They obviously take their constituents for fools.

Houston Chronicle:

Unwilling to adopt a rational national energy policy that would increase domestic supplies of energy and place downward pressure on gasoline prices, Congress is passing its time with unhelpful symbolic gestures. The House and Senate both passed bills Wednesday that would cut off the flow of oil to the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

Rep. Joe Barton, previously known for coddling the energy sector and his indifference to air pollution and the need to promote conservation, was nevertheless absolutely on the mark when he called the resolutions “feel-good” legislation. White House spokesman Scott Stanzel is right when he said there is no evidence that ceasing to pump 70,000 barrels of crude oil into the reserve daily would bring down the price of gasoline.

AP:

Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., acknowledged there was no guarantee that suspending the deliveries would lower gasoline prices, but declared: “Common sense would say not to take oil off the market during a time of record high prices.”

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve was created in the 1970s as a precaution against major interruptions of oil supplies. Today at 701 million barrels it has enough to replace two months of oil imports.

Only Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., voted against the measure.

Bush has steadfastly refused to halt shipments of about 70,000 barrel barrels of oil a day into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, a system of salt caverns on the Gulf coast. The reserve, created to respond to major oil supply disruptions, holds 701 million barrels and is at 97 percent of capacity.

“There is no evidence that (suspending shipments) will affect the price of oil or gasoline in a meaningful way,” said White House spokesman Scott Stanzel. He said the president opposes any congressional mandate to stop deliveries and believes Congress should focus on broader energy issues.

AJC – “Our Opinion”:

Stanzel and Bush are right: Suspending shipments into the reserve will have very little, if any, impact on gasoline prices.

Look at the numbers. On average, we pump 70,000 barrels a day into the reserve. Surely leaving that much oil on the market would reduce demand and prices, right?

Wrong. Seventy thousand barrels amounts to 0.35 percent of the 20 million barrels of petroleum we consume daily in this country. That won’t even dent prices.

The only rational argument in favor of suspending strategic reserve shipments is financial. If you believe the current price of oil is artificially high and will fall substantially, then it’s wise to suspend the reserve program and fill it later with cheaper oil.

On the other hand, if you believe the surge in oil prices is real and that prices will be higher five years from now than today, then we should buy that oil now, when it’s cheaper. And that’s the more likely scenario.

There’s also a third way of looking at it. If you’re part of a Congress that has done little to prepare the country for a day we all knew was coming, then voting to suspend the strategic reserve program makes sense because it lets you pretend to be doing something, even though you’re not.

Gourmet Beer Bill (HB196) up for vote in the Alabama Senate this week

Monday, May 5th, 2008

The Gourmet Beer Bill (BH196) is up for vote in the Alabama Senate this week. The bill, introduced by the Free the Hops organization, aims to increase the current restrictions on beer that ban beers containing more than 6% alcohol by volume or containers larger than 16 oz.

According to FTH, beverages defined as wine can contain up to 24% ABV and have no container size restrictions. Likewise, liquor can contain up to 100% ABV and can be sold in any size container under Alabama law. So what’s the point of banning beer with 6.5% ABV?

fth

FTH and the Gourmet Beer Bill has received recent coverage in the LA Times and even in The Scotsman (Edinburgh, Scotland). Stuart Carter, current president of FTH, hails from Scotland.

The most entertaining coverage of this issue has to be this edited recording of the recent House debate (don’t miss Alvin Holmes statements, 5:30-6:15).



Surely there are enough beers here already?

Let us put that to you another way. Would you want to be told that you can’t buy a Mercedes because there are already plenty of Fords and Hondas available? This is exactly the type of restriction that is being placed on gourmet beer in Alabama.

FTH is not trying to change the existing beers in Alabama. To refer back to the analogy, there will be plenty of Fords and Hondas around once we lift the restriction against Mercedes. FTH and its supporters would just like to have the option to choose the Mercedes of beer.

Our Climate Numbers Are a Big Old Mess

Monday, May 5th, 2008

According to this Opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal.

Patrick Michaels discusses the numerous mis-calibrated weather sensors that scientists base their global warming predictions upon and finally asks: “Why is the news on global warming always bad? Perhaps because there’s little incentive to look at things the other way. If you do, you’re liable to be pilloried by your colleagues. If global warming isn’t such a threat, who needs all that funding? Who needs the army of policy wonks crawling around the world with bold plans to stop climate change?”

greenland